New BCBC Energy Requirements

In April 2013, British Columbia took the next step towards greater energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction with the adoption of the following new BC Building Code requirements:

• Large Residential, Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Buildings (Part 3) – December 20, 2013 

The introduction of two new standards allows a choice of energy efficiency standards for Part 3 buildings (excludes houses and small buildings) that apply for permits on or after December 20, 2013.

• 2011 National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) – the province supported the development of this new Canadian standard, which, in some respects, better addresses the climatic and construction practice conditions in B.C. Adopting the NECB harmonizes B.C. with the national code development system.
• ASHRAE 90.1(2010) – this well-respected North American standard has an established infrastructure of education, training and support. The older 2004 edition has been in force within BC since 2008.

These two standards share much of the same information base. Both have traditional prescriptive compliance paths as well as performance compliance paths (whole building modeling/simulation).
However, there are differences in approach that can be summarized as follows:

• NECB is energy-based whereas ASHRAE is energy-cost based.
• ASHRAE has trade-off paths in the building envelope part only whereas NECB has trade-off paths in the building envelope part as well as in the lighting, HVAC and service hot water heating systems parts.

Some building types can be constructed more economically and/or achieve greater energy efficiency with ASHRAE; others, with the NECB which references more existing Canadian standards than ASHRAE. Code users have welcomed the flexibility offered by having two options for energy efficiency standards. However, the availability of two referenced standards comes with some special considerations.

• Housing and Small Buildings (Part 9) – December 19, 2014 

The National Building Code published a new section containing energy efficiency requirements for housing and small buildings in December 2012. Effective December 19, 2014, B.C. has adopted the package which introduces building code performance standards for windows and heating equipment for the first time in the province. B.C. has chosen to harmonize the numbering with the NBC and move the current secondary suite provisions from 9.36 to 9.37. The 2014 effective date provides ample time to prepare in recognition that builders are currently adjusting to significant new lateral load requirements in the 2012 BC Building Code.

All those involved in the design and construction of new buildings in B.C. are encouraged to seek out the information and training necessary to support a smooth transition to greater energy efficiency within the built environment. In that regard, the Homeowner Protection Office is planning a BuildingSmart seminar tour of the province in the fall of 2013 to help the low rise residential construction sector prepare for the coming energy package. The Building Officials Association of BC and other stakeholder groups are also considering education and training options. Here are some other available resources:

• Building & Safety Standards Branch Information Bulletin.
• ASHRAE subscribers can access online and live workshop training resources for the 90.1 (2010) standard on the ASHRAE website.
• Information on the NECB.
• BC Energy Code Comparison – Stantec Consulting Ltd., October 2012
• ASHRAE 90.1 2010 and NECB 2011 Cross Canada Comparison – Caneta Research Inc., January 2012
• Summary Review Assessment of Energy Performance Codes – ASHRAE 90.1-2004, 90.1-2010 and NECB for British Columbia – EnerSys Analytics Inc., December 2011

Click here for additional information on the NBC 9.36 package, upon which the B.C. requirements are primarily based.

Crashing the Boys’ Club

By Sarah Williams Goldhagen, Architectural Record
May 24, 2013

Think back to the late 1960s, when 94 percent of the students enrolled in American architecture programs were men. Or to the early 1990s— decades after the Civil Rights Act’s Title VII outlawed discrimination by gender—when more than 80 percent of architects were still men. Times have changed: more than 40 percent of graduates from architecture school are women. Attitudes about working women have also changed; nobody questions their presence in design charrettes or client meetings, and of the few architects to win a MacArthur “genius” grant, two, Elizabeth Diller and Jeanne Gang, are women; since 2004, two women, Zaha Hadid and Kazuyo Sejima (the latter with her design partner, Ryue Nishizawa), have won the Pritzker Prize. Thanks to the Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation and the International Archive of Women in Architecture, women’s historical contributions to the field are better known. Women-owned practices are common, as are female-male— often wife-husband—partnerships. And today, architecture’s future rests largely in the hands of men and women nurtured on the precepts of gender equality. More …